Thursday, 9 December 2010

Empowered customer service

 

  An incident last week triggered me to go back to ‘Empowered’, Josh Bernoff’s follow-up to ‘Groundswell’, which was published a few months ago.

The book argues that organisations must support and empower employees to solve customer problems.  To do this, they need HEROs: highly empowered and resourceful operatives, following a four-step ‘IDEA’ process (peer Influence analysis, Delivering groundswell customer service, Empowering customers with mobile and Amplifying your fans).

Anyway, what’s made me go back to the book was the example at the start of the sort of poor customer service that Bernoff’s HEROs are needed to resolve (Dooce vs Maytag).

I’ve long understood the power Twitter and social media give to people like Dooce, but I’ve never, until now, had a personal example.

Then this:

 

I was a bit concerned because I’d not booked these tickets, so even though I couldn’t find any records of this payment on any of my credit cards, I wanted to sort it out.

I’d tried phoning, I’d tried emailing, but wasn’t getting anywhere, so I thought I’d try to tweet (read from the bottom)…

 


 thetrainline 
@ 
@ Thanks John, glad we got there in the end. Have a good weekend. Ines
 Will Cleare 
@ 
 Jon Ingham 
@ @ @ Sorted. Thanks for helping make it a priority for them. 
 Jon Ingham 
@ 
@ Well done Ines, thanks for sorting for me. Shame I had to rant over twitter to get it done. 
 thetrainline 
@ 
@ I tried to ring but line engaged. Sent u an email explaining. Ines
 Jon Ingham 
I'm here. RT @ @ Thanks John. Under investigation as I type. I will be in touch shortly.
 Karen Wise 
@ 
@ it seems to worked!  
 thetrainline 
@ 
@ Thanks John. Under investigation as I type. I will be in touch shortly.
 Jon Ingham 
Sure (you have had them b4). RT @ @hey, sorry to hear that. Do you want to DM your e-mail address and phone no.? Ines
 Jon Ingham 
I bet they are!: thetrainline (@) is now following your tweets (@) on Twitter [ We're on Twitter to help] Let's see...
 Doug Shaw 
@ 
@ hope you get a resolution soon - could always write a song about it!
 thetrainline 
@ 
@ hey, sorry to hear that. Do you want to DM your e-mail address and phone no.? Ines
 Will Cleare 
@ 
 Jon Ingham 
@ @ thx anyway - feel much better now!
 Jon Ingham 
I was sort of thinking twitter would act as my customer complaints body! RT @ @ That is ridiculous -  
 Doug Shaw 
@ 
@ starting to look like one eh? train companies quite good at  
 Jon Ingham 
Does it classify as a stupid thing to a customer then? RT @ get @ his  money back? they don't seem to help
 Jon Ingham 
 is currently experiencing high volumes. Try again.. Option 3.. 3.. 3.. - engaged tone. Cut off. Not happy... turn to twitter...
 Doug Shaw 
Should we have a whip round to get @ his money back? They don't seem to be able to help
 Karen Wise 
@ 
@ That is ridiculous - can you complain to a consumer complaints body? or at least say you're going to 
 Jon Ingham 
I email . They email me back - I need to phone in. Oh oh - tried that before! Why do they think I've been emailing them!
 Jon Ingham 
5 days later, finally get them to agree to escalate the issue. 3 days later, this morning, still not heard from the escalatee
 Jon Ingham 
Just because  don't want to give me my £200 back I think! RT @ @ can't cancel what you haven't booked..do go on
 Doug Shaw 
@ 
@ can't cancel what you haven't booked.....do go on
 Jon Ingham 
They can't even give me any detail on my credit card used to find out if someone is still defrauding me on something else!
 Jon Ingham 
Starts last week with an email - my £200 ticket has been confirmed. Emailed  back - I hadn't booked it. Sorry, they can't cancel
 Jon Ingham 
OK, if you're sure the RT @dougshaw1@joningham go for it Jon - we need a Friday rantarama  sucks
 Jon Ingham 
... since it looks like they'll be going on for a while yet. You'll laugh, though I've not been.  sucks
 Doug Shaw 
@ 
@ go for it Jon - we need a Friday rantarama
 Jon Ingham 
I should have really been tweeting on the problems I've been having with .com since last week. Might as well start now...

 

This is the email I got sent:

 

OK, so not quite the same level as Dooce’s story, but then I don’t have over a million followers either.  And it will do for my social media training sessions!

 

There are a few lessons that I’d draw from this.

Firstly, if you’re not on twitter yet, then this is just one more reason that perhaps you should be.  Tired of not getting the response you need from an organisation or consumer complaints body? – if my, as well as Dooce’s experiences are anything to go on, this is the way (that sometimes) you get your answer.  Especially if you’re in a leadership role in a business or other organisation you need to understand this thing.  And the best way to understand it is to do it.  Sign up and join in!

 

As for the Trainline, I thought Inis did a great job – she stepped on my ranting quickly and cooled things down.  And within a couple of hours she’d sorted things out for me.    As I wrote in my tweet, however, it’s a shame Trainline employees on the other end of my emails couldn’t have done this themselves (and nothing can excuse making it virtually impossible for customers to contact you on the phone).  What was the difference?  Was it just that I was lucky finding Inis – or is it because she’s one of Bernoff’s HEROs that she’s been put on the twitter stream?

Actually of course, I don’t know whether Ines is a HERO or whether she’s just doing what her managers tell her.  And in a way, that’s how I would summarise my thoughts on ‘Empowered’ too.  I agree that organisations need to unleash employees to energise customers and transform their businesses.  But I don’t think they necessarily need to look for grass roots approaches to do this.  Business leaders can take hold of this agenda too.

 

And just one more point on the Trainline.  If the above wasn’t the reason my problem was resolved, is it just that a developing conversation followed by 4,000 people got a little more attention?  If so, then I think this has got to change.  Increasingly, organisations are going to have to assume that all of their customers are on Twitter and sort out their emails as fast as they do their tweets.

 

For other companies, I’d simply say you need an Ines.  There are a lot of things the Trainline could have done better – better email response, better call handling and so on.  But at least Ines was there to catch the ball before it dropped completely.  I’d about finished my rant but someone else might have gone on to write much worse if Ines hadn’t responded when she did!

 

 

  • Consulting - Research - Speaking  - Training -  Writing
  • Strategy  -  Talent  -  Engagement  -  Change and OD
  • Contact  me to  create more  value for  your business
  • jon  [dot] ingham [at] strategic [dash] hcm [dot] com

.

Thursday, 2 December 2010

Pay transparency– in the news

 

   Sir David Walker never actually suggested publishing details on each individual bankers’ pay, fearing that this would jeopardise their privacy (ah, poor dears!).  And he’s since pulled back from his milder suggestion that banks publish ‘bands’ showing the pay and bonuses of all employees earning over £1m while hiding individual employees’ names.  It seems this can’t be done unless all countries do the same thing (which was never going to happen anyway).

But the topic of pay transparency has not gone away.

 

Hutton Review

Today’s interim report from the Hutton Fair Pay Review (which I’m still reading) suggests that no civil servant should get paid more than twenty times the lowest paid worker in that organisation.

As the name of the review suggests, this focuses on fairness.  But most of the reporting of the review, if not so much the review itself, seems to interpret fairness as showing tax payers that their investments are being protected, and that the 20,000 public servants who earn more than £117k per year (including heads of Universities on £200k and CEOs of NHS trusts on £150k) deserve their salaries.  This is about managing perception – about ensuring everyone seems to be sharing the effects of austerity.  And it’s why Hutton recommends setting principles and greater transparency in what people get paid.

I’m more interested in the effect of internal pay differentials.  I think John Humphrys got it right on the Today programme this morning (as he usually does), quoting Peter Drucker’s concerns that differentials over 20 x can lead to resentment, falling morale and could become socially corrosive.

I think socially corrosive organisations is exactly what we’ve got – in the private as well as the public sector, and steep pay differentials have had their role to play in this.

 

See also:

 

 

  • Consulting  - Research - Speaking  -  Training -  Writing
  • Strategy   -  Team development  -  Web 2.0  -  Change
  • Contact  me to  create  more  value  for  your  business
  • jon [dot] ingham [at] social [dash] advantage [dot] com

.

Monday, 22 November 2010

Evaluating and selecting collaboration and social software

 

  One of the most interesting sessions I attended at my second Enterprise 2.0 conference this year was with Tony Byrne from Real Story Group talking about selecting the appropriate social tool for particular purposes.

I went to this workshop largely because my experience at the exhibition in Boston was that all the social systems there seemed to do pretty much the same job – and I wanted to be in a better place to distinguish them when I went to the exhibition at Santa Clara.

Tony suggests looking at the various tools through 4 prisms:

1   What business scenarios the tools support

What do different technologies actually do (or want to do)?  This is the most important prism as software developers will have a purpose in mind when they build a system.

Organisations need to be clear about what scenario they need to fill.  Why do it (or let it happen)?  These questions often doesn’t get answered – organisations leave it to more abstract discussion.

Yes, emergence has a role to play, and  some organisations are more emergent than others. But you really need a good strategy – there are many different reasons implementing social software…

 

Tools for collaboration are different to those for networking

The traditional emphasis of these systems for the last two decades has been on collaboration which Tony defines as organising projects and doing certain types of work, formalising informal activities etc.

The newer tools are based on the of success of social media sites and a reaction to this – so they are more about discovering and socialising information – about discussion, not necessarily in explicit projects.

The first set of tools are too stilted – the second more flexible, enabling the wisdom of the crowds.

These two sets of systems inhabit different worlds technologically (eg IBM Quickr for collaboration vs Lotus Connections for networking) although it may not always seen this way.  But the issue is that organisations don’t want to move everyone over from Jive to Sharepoint once they start formalising information relationships.  You need to be able to do both of these things well within one platform – not just friending someone in Singapore but the ability to get work done.

 

Within and beyond firewall

Tony referred to the extension of social software beyond the firewall as crossing the rubicon:

  • External opportunities include branded communities, reader interaction, external collaboration, professional networking
  • Internal opportunities include project collaboration, enterprise discussion, information organisation and filtering, knowledgebase management, communities of practice etc.

 

2   What functional services do the tools provide?

This is the second prism – what social software services are included in the system (ask what you need it for first)?  Eg, including:

  • Blog
  • Wiki
  • Project tracking and participation (critical to collaboration)
  • Multimedia
  • Info ranking and filtering
  • File sharing (seems mundane but the mother of collaboration)
  • Microblogging
  • Discussion
  • Presence / Instant Messaging
  • Profiling / people finding.

 

You need the right tool / the fight fit.  Technology matters – it’s not all about sociology.  Even within wikis there is a large variation…

Companies want social as a service (SAAS) etc but the cool tools are frequently immature.

Vendors also offer a range of intangibles - customers are not always so happy with these.

 

3   What common application services are offered?

Eg:

  • Filtering
  • Editing and commenting
  • Personalisation
  • Repository services
  • Workforce and process management
  • Handheld delivery
  • Feeds
  • Vocabularies and tagging
  • Search

 

4   The admin and system services perspective

It’s important to avoid what Tony called enterprise surprise, eg tools which worked really well somewhere but then not – eg which don’t support different languages

Metrics is another important aspect here.

 

So, did this framework help?, Was I able to decipher the vendors’ unique capabilities?

I’ll be posting shortly on this…

 

 

  • Consulting  - Research - Speaking  -  Training -  Writing
  • Strategy   -  Team development  -  Web 2.0  -  Change
  • Contact  me to  create  more  value  for  your  business
  • jon [dot] ingham [at] social [dash] advantage [dot] com

.

Wednesday, 17 November 2010

Collaborative capacity: The role of Culture in Enterprise 2.0

 

  So earlier this month, I delivered a session at the Santa Clara Enterprise 2.0 conference together with Margaret Schweer – a colleague of Tammy Erickson from nGeneral Insight (Moxie Software).

Margaret outlined the factors which are important in building collaborative capacity / culture, and some of the things organisations are doing to develop it.

I emphasised the need for E2.0 (and HR) practitioners to switch their focus to social outcomes like collaborative capacity (and/or I’d suggest other social outcomes such as innovation, speed, learning, customer service etc).

And I suggested the two key things companies wanting to take advantage of these opportunities need to do are:

  • Have a strategic / social intent – or mojo
  • Plan face-to-face and technological activities around this mojo and desired outcomes.

 

This is the important point - just implementing 2.0 technologies won’t necessarily produce these outcomes – you need to plan for them.

This doesn’t discount the role of emergence – but these things are too important to be left to chance.

Comments /thoughts?

 

See this write-up on the session.

 

Some of the tweets:

  • VictorHeredia: Interesting concept of Organizational Capabilities as an improvement of core competencies presented by @joningham at #e2conf
  • joningham: RT @VictorHeredia: @joningham:"Successful, sustainable collaboration platforms have to work for the individual" at #e2conf, and help the individual in his work
  • rdeis: Trust is essential for collaboration. For most, trust develops through relationships. Margaret Schweer @nGeneraInsight #e2conf
  • rdeis: Create employment practices consistent with a ?Community of Adults? Stop measuring time. Margaret Schweer @nGeneraInsight #e2conf
  • rdeis: Employees First, Customers Second. book by Vineet Nayar. Recommended by @joningham People, Culture, Behavior Session #e2conf
  • mijori23: RT @joningham Business people may not like the word ('social') - that's the problem. #e2conf Their customers use it - learn to like it!
  • joningham: RT@lehawes @roonoid Want to improve collaboration culture? First realize that most collaboration doesn't happen online #e2conf
  • jdthurber: @joningham I think it is more than that. "Social" doesn't really describe the full impact/purpose of the new "social corporation." #e2conf

 

And I liked this tweet from earlier on as well:

  • ITSinsider: "You're going to succeed or fail on culture." @bsandie presents for 30 min on adoption and has not yet talked technology. #e2conf

 

Why would you need to?

 

Picture credit: Ryan Coleman

 

  • Consulting  - Research - Speaking  -  Training -  Writing
  • Strategy   -  Team development  -  Web 2.0  -  Change
  • Contact  me to  create  more  value  for  your  business
  • jon [dot] ingham [at] social [dash] advantage [dot] com

.

Sunday, 5 September 2010

HR Technology Strategies

 

   In July, I noted my beliefs that June’s E 2.0 conference needed a greater focus on HR issues, ie culture, behaviours etc and also on the HR function itself – but also that I didn’t think either I or this subject would get on the agenda.

It looks like I’ve been proved wrong, and I’m pleased to see HR Technologies promoted to a new track at this November’s conference in Santa Clara:

“Human Resources professionals are at the center of managing the most valuable asset a company possesses - its people - and how to get them to interact and collaborate more effectively. Enterprise 2.0 planning typically straddles the intersection between Line of Business needs, Human Resources and Information Technology.

While Line of Business and IT typically have specific and often urgent needs, the realities and complexities of human resources can have longer term implications. And in today's economy, scale is key whether in terms of growth, downsizing, or merger and acquisition strategies. Keeping the nucleus of a business collaborating while blending other cultures into the mix is a challenge often underestimated by strategists who assume the 'boxes are checked' in software solutions.

The HR Technology Strategies track will discuss how to ensure the HR voice and perspective is heard in strategic planning, and that the Enterprise 2.0 technology being contemplated is appropriate for your company size and personnel profiles. We will focus on realizing business value from collaboration tools, and how to strategize around building on existing technology foundations—including payroll, comps, benefits, incentives and training/learning—to transition into a more connected and aware culture and organization. The realities of staff types, ages and workflow needs will be addressed, including how to shape them so they evolve over time to meet your business goals.”

 

More on this soon, and I suppose I should also, as promised, finish my blogging from the June conference!

 

 

 

  • Consulting  - Research - Speaking  -  Training -  Writing
  • Strategy   -  Team development  -  Web 2.0  -  Change
  • Contact  me to  create  more  value  for  your  business
  • jon [dot] ingham [at] social [dash] advantage [dot] com

.

Wednesday, 1 September 2010

Looking back to September 2009

 

   You may also be interested in these posts from September last year:

 

Or even from the year before?

 

Picture: Halogen incandescent light bulb (banned by the European Union in September 2009, beginning a phase-out in favour of energy-saving compact fluorescent lamps.

 

 

  • Consulting  - Research - Speaking  -  Training -  Writing
  • Strategy   -  Team development  -  Web 2.0  -  Change
  • Contact  me to  create  more  value  for  your  business
  • jon [dot] ingham [at] social [dash] advantage [dot] com

.